El legado de Humberto Maturana y Francisco Varela: Desarrollos, desafíos y aplicaciones de la teoría autopoiética en el siglo XXI

El legado de Humberto Maturana y Francisco Varela Desarrollos, desafíos y aplicaciones de la teoría autopoiética en el siglo XXI 66 REFERENCIAS Alvargonzález, D. (2022). La idea de sistema. Editorial Verbum. Bonduriansky, R., Crean, A. J., & Day, T. (2012). The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments. Evolutionary Applica- tions, 5 (2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00213.x Corti, L. (2023). Organizational normativity and teleology: A critique. Synthese, 202 (3), Artículo 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04255-7 Deacon, T. W., & García-Valdecasas, M. (2023). A thermodynamic basis for te- leological causality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mat- hematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 381 (2252), 20220282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0282 Dresow, M., & Love, A. C. (2023). Teleonomy: Revisiting a proposed conceptual replacement for teleology. Biological Theory, 18 (2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00424-y England, J. L. (2013). Statistical physics of self-replication. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139 , 121923. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4818538 García-Valdecasas, M. (2021). On the naturalisation of teleology: Self-organisa- tion, autopoiesis and teleodynamics. Adaptive Behavior, 30 (2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712321991890 García-Valdecasas, M., & Deacon, T. W. (2024a). Biological functions are causes, not effects: A critique of selected effects theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103 , 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.002 García-Valdecasas, M., & Deacon, T. W. (2024b). Origins of biological teleology: How constraints represent ends. Synthese, 204 (2), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04705-w Ha, D., Kim, D., Kim, I., Oh, Y., Kong, J., Han, S. K., & Kim, S. (2022). Evolu- tionary rewiring of regulatory networks contributes to phenotypic diffe- rences between human and mouse orthologous genes. Nucleic Acids Re- search, 50 (4), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac050