Libro de Actas del III Congreso Latinoamericano y del Caribe e Investigación en Educación Superior- LatinSoTL- 2025

263 cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1– 25). Springer. 2. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4 (3), 359–373. 3. Bengmark, S., Thunberg, H., & Winberg, T. M. (2017). Success factors in transition to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48 (7), 988–1001. 4. Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton University Press. 5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. 6. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS). (2016). Active Learning in Post-Secondary Mathematics Education . http://www.cbmsweb.org/Statements/Active_Learning_Statement.pdf 7. Faulkner, F., Breen, C., Prendergast, M., & Carr, M. (2021). Profiling mathematical procedural and problem-solving skills of undergraduate students following a new mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54 (2), 220–249. 8. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 , 906–911. 9. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (23), 8410–8415. 10. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44 , 5–23. 11. Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: an instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33 (1), 31- 58. 12. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30 , 26–35. 13. Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51 (2), 289–299. 14. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21 , 31–42. 15. Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2019). Levers for Change: An Assessment of Progress on Changing Instruction in Undergraduate Mathematics, Science, and Engineering. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 16. Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2017). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29 (4), 693–715. 17. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.