Entornos de enseñanza y aprendizaje mediados por tecnologías

65 International Center for Academic Integrity (2013). Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity. Disponible en https://academicintegrity.org/resources/fundamental-values Jaggars, S. S. & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education , 95, 270-284. Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and Expert Teachers’ Conceptions of Learners’ Prior Knowledge. Science Education, 88 (6), 970-983. MINEDUC, División de Educación Superior (2016). Marco Nacional de Cualificaciones para la Educación Superior . Ministerio de Educación. Mulder, R., Pearce, J. & Baik, C. (2014). Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15 (2), 157-171. Nicol, D., and Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking Technology-Supported Assessment Practices in Relation to the Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. En C. Bryan and K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 64 – 77). London: Routledge. Owston, R. (2017). Empowering learners Through Blended Learning. International Journal on E-learning, 17 (1), 65-83. Pappas, G., Lederman, E. y Broadbent, B. (2001). Monitoring student performance in online courses: new game-new rules. Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2): 66-71. Perrenoud, P. (2004). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Barcelona: Graó. Programa de Escritura Disciplinar UC (s.f) ¿De qué forma puedo retroalimentar una tarea de escritura? Disponible en http://escrituradisciplinar.uc.cl/images/Recursos/De-qu- manera-puedo-retroalimentar-una-tarea-de-escritura.pdf Silva, M. (2012). Camtasia in the Classroom: Student Attitudes and Preferences for Video Commentary or Microsoft Word Comments During the Revision Process. Computers and Composition , 29, 1-22. Su á rez, R. (2002). La educaci ó n. Teor í as educativas, estrategias de ense ñ anza aprendizaje. Editorial Trillas.