Nueva educación pública: contexto, contenidos y perspectivas de la desmunicipalización

170 NuevaEducaciónPública: Contexto, contenidos y perspectivasde ladesmunicipalización Patterson, C. (2006). School District Consolidation and Public School Efficiency. Texas Public Policy Foundation. Retrieved from: <http://www.texaspolicy.com/library/doclib/2006-02-PP- consolidation-cp.pdf>. Pennsylvania School Boards Association (2009). Merger/Consolidation of School Districts: Does it savemoney and improve achievement. Retrieved from: <http://mrea-mt.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/04/PA-psba-merger-consolidation.pdf>. Politeia (2008). Mejoramiento de la Gestión y la Calidad de la Educación Municipal. Estudio contratado por el Departamento de Estudios del Ministerio de Educación. Raczynski, D. y Salinas, D. (2009). Prioridades, actores y procesos en la gestión municipal de la educación. EnM. Marcel y Raczynski (Eds.). La asignatura pendiente. Claves para la Revalidación de la Educación Pública de Gestión Local en Chile (pp. 135-176). Santiago, Chile: Uqbar Editores & CIEPLAN. Raczynski, D. Muñoz, G.,Weinstein, J. y Pascual, J. (2013). Subvención escolar preferencial (SEP) en Chile: un intento para equilibrar lamacro y lamicro política escolar. REICE. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación . Raczynski, D., yMuñoz, G. (2007). Reforma educacional chilena: El difícil equilibrio entre lamacro y la micro-política. REICE: Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación , 5 (3), 40-83. OECD (2014), OECDRegional Outlook 2014: Regions and Cities:Where Policies and PeopleMeet , OECD Publishing, Paris, <https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201415-en>. Schleicher, A. (2012) (Ed). Preparing Teachers andDeveloping School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around theWorld OECD Publishing Seashore Louis, K., Dretzke, B. y Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice , 21(3), 315-336. Shakrani, S.M. (2010). School District Consolidation Study in 10 Michigan Counties Is district consolidation cost effective? What is the alternative to consolidation?. Education Policy Center at Michigan State University. Working Paper#15. Retrieved from: <http://files.eric . ed.gov/fulltext/ED537156.pdf>. Southern Regional Educational Board (2010). The three essentials: Improving Schools Requires District Vision, District and State Support, and Principal Leadership. Retrieved from: <https:// www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Three-Essentials-to-Improving- Schools.pdf>. Sui-chu Ho, E. (2006). Educational decentralization in Japan, Korea and Hong-Kong. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 44, No. 6, 2006, pp. 590-603. Taylor, M(2011). HowSmall Is Too Small? AnAnalysis of School District Consolidation. Lao Report. Retrieved from: <https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/edu/district_consolidation/district_consoli- dation_050211.pdf>.