Odontología restauradora: protocolos clínicos

Capítulo 111 • PROCEDIMIENTOSADHESIVOS REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRAFICAS 1. Henostroza, G., Adhesión en Odontología Restauradora. 21ed.2010: Ripano S.A. 520p. 2. Perdigao, J., New developments in dental adhesion. Oent Clin North Am, 2007. 51(2): p. 333-57, viii. 3. Swift, E.J., Jr., J. Perdigao, and H.0. Heymann, Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and stateof the art, 1995. Quintessence lnt, 1995. 26(2): p. 95-110. 4. Baier, R.E., Principies of adhesion. Oper Oent, 1992. Suppl 5: p.1-9. 5. Marshall, S.J.,et al., A review of adhesionscience. Oent Mater, 2010.26(2): p. e11·6. 6. Ten Cate, A., Histología Oral. 1994, BuenosAires: Panamericana. 7. Buonocore, M.G., A simple method of increasing the adhesionof acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. JDent Res, 1955. 34(6): p. 849-53. 8. Buonocore, M.G., A. Matsui, and AJ. Gwinnett. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol. 1968.13(1): p. 61-70. 9. Gwinnett, A.J. and A. Matsui, A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol, 1967.12(12): p. 1615-20. 10. Breschi, L., et al., Field emission in-lens SEM study of ename! and dentin. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999. 46(3): p. 315-23. 11. Garberoglio, R.and M .Brannstrom, Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentina! tubules.Arch Oral Biol,1976. 21(6): p. 355-62. 12. Perdigao, J. and M. Lopes, Dentin bonding--state of the art1999. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1999. 20(12): p. 1151-8,1160-2; quiz1164. 13. Pashley, D.H., M.J. Livingston, and J.D. Greenhill, Regional resistances to fluid flow in human dentinein vitro. Arch Oral Biol,1978. 23(9): p. 807-10. 14. Perdigao, J., Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure.Oent Clin North Am, 2002. 46(2): p. 277-301, vi. 15. Stangel, l., T.H. Ellis, and E.Sacher, Adhesion to toothstructure mediated by contemporary bondingsystems.Dent Clin North Am,2007. 51(3): p. 677-94, vii. 16. Abate, P.F., V.I. Rodriguez, and R.L. Macchi, Evaporation of solvent in one-bottleadhesives. J Oent, 2000. 28(6): p.437-40. 17. Pashley, D.H., et al., Solvent-induced dimensional changes in EDTA·deminera!ized dentin matrix. J Biomed Mater Res, 2001. 56(2): p. 273-81. 18. El Feninat. F., et al., A tapping mode AFM study ofcollapse and denaturation in dentinal collagen. Dent Mate,. 2001. 17(4): p. 284-8. 19. El Feninat, F., et al., Moisture-dependent renaturation of collagen in phosphoric acid etched human dentin. J Siomed Mater Res, 1998, 42(4):p. 549-53. 20. Green, D.J. and A. Banerjee, Contemporary adhesive bonding: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice. Oent Update, 2011. 38(7): p. 439-40, 443-6, 449-50. 21. Moszner, N., U. Salz, and J. Zimmermann, Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: asystematíc review. Oent Mater, 2005. 21(10): p. 895-910 22. lmazato, S., et al., Degreeof conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater, 2001. 17(2): p.178·83. 23. Sano, H., et al., Microporous dentin zone beneath resin·impregnated !ayer. Oper Dent, 1994. 19(2): p. 59-64. 24. Jacobsen, T. and K.J. Soderholm, Sorne effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater,1995. 11(2): p. 132-6. 25. Perdigao, J., et al., Enamel bond strengths ofpairs of adhesives from the samemanufacturer. Oper Dent. 2005. 30(4): p. 492-9. 26. lnoue, S., et al., Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. JAdhes Dent. 2001. 3(3): p. 237-45. 27. Breschi, l., et al., Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Oent Mater, 2008. 24(1):p. 90-101. 28. King, N.M., et al., Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent, 2005. 18(2): p. 126-34. 29. Pashley, E.l., et al., Effects of one versus two applications ofan unfilled, alt-in-one adhesiveon dentine bonding. JOent, 2002. 30(2-3): p. 83-90. 30. Hashimoto, M.,et al., Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent, 2004. 29(4): p. 416-23. 31. lto, S., et al., Effects of multiplecoatings of two all-in-one adhesives ondentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005. 7(2): p. 133-41. 32. Hashimoto. M., et al., Permeability of adhesive resin films. J Biomed Mate, Res BApplBiomater, 2005. 74(2): p.699-705. 33. Van Landuyt. K.L.. et al., Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Oent Res. 2005. 84(2): p. 183-8. 34. Cadenaro, M .. et al., Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005.113(6): p.525-30. 35. Cadenaro, M., et al., lnfluence of whitening on the degree of conversion of dental adhesives on dentin. Eur JOral Sci, 2006. 114(3): p. 257-62. 36. Hebling, J., etal., Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res, 2005. 84(8): p. 741~6. 37. Carrilho, M.R, et al., Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond invitro. J Dent Res, 2007. 86(1): p.90·4. 38. Brackett, W.W., et al., The effect of chlorhexidine on dentin hybrid layers invivo. Oper Dent, 2007. 32(2): p. 107·11. 39. Pasquantonio, G., et al.,Electric device improves bonds of simplified etch-and·rinse adhesives. Dent Mater, 2007. 23(4): p.513-8. 40.Breschi, L., et al., Electric-current-assisted application of self-etch adhesives to dentin. JDent Res, 2006. 85(12): p. 1092-6. 41. Brackett, W.W., et al., The effect of chlorhexidine on dentin hybrid layers invivo. Oper Oent, 2007. 32(2): p.107-11. OdontologíaReslauradora- ProtocolosClínicos 47