Las responsabilidades de los Estados frente a la crisis climática. Litigios globales y derecho internacional

407 Responsabilidad internacional de los Estados sion.gov/explanation-of-position-on-resolution-entitled-request-for-an- advisory-opinion-of-the-international-court-of-justice/ . Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. 2009. Caso González y otros (“Campo Algodonero”) vs. México Sentencia de 16 de noviembre de 2009 (Excepción Preliminar, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas), Corte Interameri- cana de Derechos Humanos, párr. 252. CIJ. 1949. The Corfu Channel Case. Judgment . Corte Internacional de Justicia, párrafo 22. CIJ. 1996. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion , Corte Internacional de Justicia, párr. 29. CIJ. 1997. Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, Corte In- ternacional de Justicia. CIJ. 2006. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Provisional Mea- sures, Corte Internacional de Justicia, párr. 197. IPCC. 2018. The Climate System: An Overview. Baede, A. P. M. (coord.). p. 87. Disponible en: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ TAR-01.pdf. Johansson, Angelica, et al. 2022. “Evaluating progress on loss and damage: an assessment of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism under the UNFCCC.” Climate Policy (22), 9-10, pp. 1199-1212. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2112935. Tribunal Permanente de Justicia Internacional. 1932. Treatment of Polish Natio- nals and Other Persons of Polish Origin or Speech in the Danzig Territory, Advisory Opinion , A. W. Sijthoff’s Publishing Company, p. 24. Skoog, Olof. 2024. EU Statement - UN General Assembly: Resolution reques- ting an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on climate change. European External Action Service. Disponible en: https://www. eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-new-york/eu-statement-%E2%80%93- un-resolucion-de-la-asamblea-general-solicitando-un-opinion-de-asesoria- en-un-tribunal-internacional_es. PNUMA. 2023. “2023 Report. The Production Gap Executive Summary”. En Phasing down or phasing up? Top fossil fuel producers plan even more extraction despite climate promises, p. 5. Disponible en: https://produc- tiongap.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/SEI_PGR2023_ExecSum_ fnl_Spanish.pdf . Naciones Unidas. 1941. “Trail Smelter Case (United States v. Canada)”. Reports of International Arbitral Awards , pp. 1905-1982.