Innovación para la sostenibilidad: custodia ambiental del Parque Carén

36 CUSTOD I A AMB I ENTAL DEL PARQUE CARÉN 67. Martin, B. R. (2016). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/ scv077 68. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350. https://doi. org/10.1002/smj 69. Fairweather, G. W. (1967). Methods for experimental social innovation. JohnWiley & Sons Ltd. 70. Lee, J., &Woo, J. (2020). Green New Deal Policy of South Korea: Policy Innovation for a Sustainability Transition. Sustainability, 12, 17. 71. Mascia, M. B., & Mills, M. (2018). When conservation goes viral: The diffusion of inno- vative biodiversity conservation policies and practices. Conservation Letters, 9. https://doi. org/10.1111/conl.12442 72. McMahon, D., & Thorsteinsdóttir, H. (2013). Pursuing endogenous high-tech innovation in developing countries: A look at regenerative medicine innovation in Brazil, China and India. Research Policy, 42(4), 965–974. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.003 73. Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., & Alves, G. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior Technology behaviors in education innovation. Computers in Human Behavior, 3. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.049 74. Banbury, C. M., & Mitchell, W. (1995). The effect of introducing important incremental in- novations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management Journal, 16(I 995), 161–182. 75. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323– 1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578 76. Baldwin, C., Hippel, E. Von, Baldwin, C., & Hippel, E. Von. (2011). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovatio to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. 77. Song, Y., Grippa, F., Gloor, P., & Leitão, J. (2019). Collaborative Innovation Networks (Y. Song, F. Grippa, P. Gloor, & J. Leitão (eds.)). Springer. 78. Edwards-Schachter, M., &Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of de- fining social innovation. Technological Forecast- ing and Social Change, 119(December), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012 79. Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2018). Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Innovation, Economic Devel- opment and Policy: Selected Essays, 38, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006 80. Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. (2018). Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Innovation Paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.02.001 81. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportu- nities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034 82. Mazzucato, M. (2021). Misión Economía: Una carrera espacial para cambiar el capitalis- mo (1era edición). Penguin Random House. 83. Birkinshaw, J., & Mol, M. (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 81–88. 84. Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technolo- gy. Science, Technlogoy, & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. 85. Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Inno- vation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its chal-