Fortalecimiento y crecimiento del Sistema de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e Innovación

43 Pennington, D. (2016). A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0354-5 Pfister, T. (2015). Coproducing European Integration Studies: Infrastructures and Epistemic Movements in an Interdisciplinary Field. Minerva, 53(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11024-015-9275-4 Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 Steger, C., Hirsch, S., Evers, C., Branoff, B., Petrova, M., Nielsen-Pincus, M., … van Riper, C. J. (2018). Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration. Eco- logical Economics, 143, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016 Tobias, S., Ströbele, M. F., & Buser, T. (2019). How transdisciplinary projects influence parti- cipants’ ways of thinking: a case study on future landscape development. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0532-y Urquiza, A., Amigo, C., Billi, M., Brandão, G., & Morales, B. (2018). Metálogo como herramienta de colaboración transdisciplinaria. Cinta de Moebio, 62(62), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.4067/ S0717-554X2018000200182 Vilsmaier, U., Engbers, M., Luthardt, P., Maas-Deipenbrock, R. M., Wunderlich, S., & Scholz, R. W. (2015). Case-based Mutual Learning Sessions: knowledge integration and transfer in trans- disciplinary processes. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11625-015-0335-3

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzc3MTg=