Innovación social y pública: experiencias y aproximaciones a la complejidad contemporánea
CAPÍTULO I. El desafío de lo público Experiencias y aproximaciones a la complejidad contemporánea INNOVACIÓN SOCIAL y PÚBLICA 196 Slyke, D. M., y Alexander, R. W. (2006). Public service lea- dership: Opportunities for clarity and coherence. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(4), 362–374. Söderlind, D., y Petersson, O. (1986). Svensk förvaltnings- politik. Diskurs. Sørensen, E., y Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. Sourouni, A. M. (2010). Towards the government transformation: An ontology-based government knowledge repository. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 32(1), 44–53. Stoneman, P., y Diederen, P. (1994). Technology Diffusion and Public Policy. The Economic Journal, 104(425), 918–930. Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., y Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455–1479. Trott, P. (2001). The role of market research in the development of discontinuous new products. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 117–126. Umans, T. (2020). Top management teams’ shared leadership and ambidexterity: The role of management control systems. Inter- national Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 444–462. Vargo, S. L., y Lusch, R. F. (2014). Evolving to a new domi- nant logic for marketing. En The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing. Routledge (pp. 21–46). Verganti, R., y Öberg, Å. (2013). Interpreting and envisio- ning—A hermeneutic framework to look at radical innovation of meanings. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 86–95. Vigoda Gadot, E. (2008). Public sector innovation for europe: A multinational eight-country exploration of citizens’pers- pectives. Public Administration, 86(2), 307–329.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzc3MTg=