Innovar y transformar desde las disciplinas: experiencias claves en la educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe 2021-2022

3 2.5 Data collection instruments For the analysis of the information, the HE CASM - 85 Inventory was used, whose tech- nical sheet, developed and validated by (Vicuña Peri, sf). The form of administration of the questionnaire is individual and collective with a duration of approximately 15 to 20 minutes. The development of the field of application went to students from the first to the tenth semester. Characteristics of the inventory is made up of 53 items distributed in 5 areas that are detailed below: • Area I: How do you study? ( CEU) Consisting of 12 items • Area II: How do you do your homework? ( CHT ) It has 10 items. • Area III: How do you prepare for your exams? ( CPE) It has 11 items • Area IV: How do you listen to the classes? ( CEC) It has 12 items • Area V: What accompanies your study moments? ( QAE) Includes 8 items. 2.6 Correction rules The HE Inventory is made up of 53 statements, the items are of a closed dichotomous type, that is, with responses (Always - Never), which provide information about the characteristics of the students with respect to HE through the evaluation of the five areas. Qualification. The answers are scored dichotomously: one (1) and zero (0); Once the subject has fin- ished answering, the inventory is scored by placing a point on the answers that were significantly emitted by the high AR students and that are considered as adequate study habits, and with zero to the answers emitted by the AR students. under AR and denoting inadequate study habits, these scores are placed in the direct score (PD) column to then perform the total sum of the test and place the subject in the corresponding category according to the scattergraph scale. 2.7 Internal validity of the structure To effect the internal validity of the construct, according to (Martínez Miguélez, 2006, p. 167) consisted of correlating the areas of the inventory of HE CASM 85. The validity of the test was established by verifying the validity of the components by means of a structural analysis using an exploratory factor analysis. Samples of measures of viabil- ity KMO (Kaiser Meyer Olkin) were applied, where the result must be greater than 0.5. A pilot sample of 100 judges with characteristics similar to the population was used. 949