Innovar y transformar desde las disciplinas: experiencias claves en la educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe 2021-2022

3 Referencias Abdullah, D. F., Kristina, D., & Sumardi, S. (2020). Toward creativity and speaking ability of EFL students: A mixed - method study. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 23 (2), 207 - 219. https://e - journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/2469 Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social l oafing on group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 255 - 264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283 Alan, B., & Stoller, F. L. (2005). Maximizing the benefits of project work in foreign language classrooms. English Teaching Forum , 43 (4), 10 - 21. Ardi Marwan, A. (2015). Empowering English through project -based l earning with ICT. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14 (4), 28 - 37. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/1443.pdf. Areti, K. (2018). Project work and information and communication technologies in the teaching of English as a foreign language. Journal of Linguistics and Literature , 2 (1), 20 - 24. http://pubs.sciepub.com/jll/2/1/3 Astawa, N. L. P. N. S. P., Artini, L. P., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2017). Project - based learning activities and EFL students’ productive skills in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Re- search , 8 (6), 1147 - 1155. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0806.16 Avci, H., & Adiguzel, T. (2017). A case study on Mobile -b lended collaborative learning in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning , 18 (7), 45 - 58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3261 Azmi, N. (2017). The benefits of using ICT in the EFL classroom: From perceived utility to potential challenges. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7 (1), 111 - 118. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p111 Brown, J. D. (2005). Research methods for applied linguistics. In: A. Davies and C. Elder, (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 476 - 500). Oxford: Blackwell. Chao, C. (2013). Creative language learning projects with emerging digital media. In Department of English, National Chengchi University (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Con- ference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC 27) (pp. 512 - 519). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y13 - 2001.pdf Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ap- proaches. (4. a e d.). SAGE Publications. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (39), 19251 - 19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116 Du, X., & Han, J. (2016). A Literature r eview on the d efinition and p rocess of p roject -based learning and other relative studies. Creative Education , 07 (07), 1079 - 1083. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77112 Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of class- rooms. The Physics Teacher, 40 (4), 206 - 209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1474140 Fried- Booth, D., L. (2002). Project work (2. a ed.). Oxford University Press. Gai Mali, Y. C. y Timotius, A. I. (2018). Project based activities in a CALL classroom: efl stu- dents’ experiences. International Journal of Education, 11 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i1.10177 Hedge, T. (1993). Key concepts in ELT. ELT Journal, 47 (3), 275 - 276. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.3.275 Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Sashittal, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of 81