Nueva educación pública: contexto, contenidos y perspectivas de la desmunicipalización
168 NuevaEducaciónPública: Contexto, contenidos y perspectivasde ladesmunicipalización Bellei, C., Valenzuela, J., Vanni, X. y Contreras, D. (2014). Lo aprendí en la escuela ¿Cómo se logran procesos de mejoramiento escolar? Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile. Berry, C. &West, M. (2010). Growing Pains: The School Consolidation Movement and Student Outcomes. The Journal of Law, Economics, &Organization , (26)1:1-29. Burkhauser, S. (2015). Three Perspectives on Public School District Staff Turnover . Rand Report. Campbell, C. & Fullan, M. (2006). Unlocking Potential for Learning: Effective District-Wide Strategies to Raise Student Achievement in Literacy and Numeracy . Toronto, ON.CA.: Ministry of Education of Ontario. CEDLE (2017). Informe de Políticas: simplificar los requerimientos a los directivos escolares. Documento de Trabajo. Santiago de Chile. Cheol Shin, J. (2011). South Korea: Decentralized Centralization – Fading Shared Governance and RisingManagerialism. In ChangingGovernance andManagement inHigher Education, Locke Cummings Fisher (ed). Chapter 15. Pp 321. Council of EuropeanMunicipalities andRegions. 2016. Local andRegional Government in Europe. Structure and competencies. Retrieved from: <http://www.ccre.org/img/uploads/piecesjointe/ filename/CEMR_structures_and_competences_2016_EN.pdf>. Datnow, A. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H. (2002). Extending Educational Reform: FromOne School toMany . New York: Routledge Falmer, 2002. Eurydice (2015). The Structure of the European Education Systems 2015/16: Schematic Dia- grams. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union . Fairman, J. C. &Donis-Keller, C. (2012). School district reorganization inMaine: Lessons learned for policy and process . Maine Policy Review 21(2), pp. 24 -40. Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., y Achilles, C. M. (2003). The «why’s» of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research , 73 (3), 321-368. Fischel, W.A. (2009). Neither «Creatures of the State» nor «Accidents of Geography»: The Con- solidation of American Public-School Districts in the Twentieth Century. The University of Chicago LawReview. Fullan, M., Bertani, A., Quinn, J. (2004). New Lessons for Districtwide Reform. Effective leader- ship for change at the district level has 10 crucial components. Educational Leadership . Vol. 61, 7, pp.42-46. Galway, G., Sheppard, B.,Wiens, J. Brown, J., (2013). The Impact of Centralization on Local School District Governance in Canada. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy . 145. Harris, A., Gunraj, J., James, S., Clarke, P. Harris, B. (2006) Improving Schools in Exceptionally Chal- lenging Circumstances: tales from the frontline . ContinuumPublishing Group, London. Hattie, J. (2005). The paradox of reducing class size and improving learning outcomes. Interna- tional Journal of Educational Research , 43 (6), 387-425. Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., yMackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 25 (2), 257-281.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzc3MTg=