Traumatología de la rodilla

Universidad de Chile 21. Gilmour A., MacLean A., Rowe P., Banger M., Donnelly I., Jones B., Blyth M. Robotic-Arm Assisted Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2 year Clinical outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2018. 22. Blyth M., Anthony I., Rowe P., Banger M., MacLean A., Jones B. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res, 2017. 23. Jenny JY, Picard F. SICOT J., 2017;3:39. 24. Kayani B., Konan S., Pietrzak J., Hug S., Tahmassebi J., Haddad F. The learning curve associated with robotic- arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1033–42. 25. Kayani B., Konan S., Tahmassebi J., Haddad F. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workfow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018. 26. Swank L., M. Alkire, M. Conditt, J. H. Lonner. Technology and Cost Effectiveness in Knee Arthroplasty; Computer Navigation and Robotics. American Journal of Orthop. February, 2009. 27. Moschetti W., Konopka J., Rubash H. Can Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Be Cost- Effective? A Markov Decision Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2016:759-765. 28. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, et al. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefts and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2756–62. 29. Ossendorf C, Fuchs B, Koch P. Femoral stress fracture after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2006;13:397–9. 441